Considering cautious responses
I need to be careful about hallucinating details since we're offline. I think it's best to ask the user if they want details, like a summary or confirmation. It's probably helpful to get clarifying questions, like what specific information they want: an incident timeline, career details, impact, or sources? I should acknowledge the topic briefly and suggest I can look up sources while avoiding heavy formatting. But web requests aren’t in my tool list; using shell isn't ideal.Offering a concise summary
I think it’s a conversation where I don’t need to fetch too much information. I can summarize the player's history briefly, touching on his time at Shenhua and Kitchee, while mentioning the club's announcement about the early termination due to a disciplinary breach. I’ll avoid speculation since specifics aren’t disclosed.
I could offer to create a timeline of his career or compare disciplinary policies. I should also plan to present options for what the user would like, all while incorporating some Chinese text for clarity.

如果按你说的消息,杰志已因“严重违反纪律准则”与金信煜提前解约,多半是俱乐部官方公告直接生效的处理。通常这类通报不会细说细节,需等后续声明或媒体披露。
简要背景

你想看哪种信息?